Issue - meetings
Conduct and Convictions of a Private Hire / Hackney Carriage (Joint) Driver
Conduct and Convictions of a Private Hire / Hackney Carriage (Joint) Driver, and Breach of Conditions
For Members to consider the conduct and
motoring convictions of a Private Hire / Hackney Carriage (Joint)
Driver licensed with this Authority.
- Restricted enclosure 2 , View reasons restricted (5/2)
- Restricted enclosure 3 , View reasons restricted (5/3)
- Restricted enclosure 4 , View reasons restricted (5/4)
- Restricted enclosure 5 , View reasons restricted (5/5)
- Restricted enclosure 6 , View reasons restricted (5/6)
- Restricted enclosure 7 , View reasons restricted (5/7)
- Restricted enclosure 8 , View reasons restricted (5/8)
- Restricted enclosure 9 , View reasons restricted (5/9)
- Restricted enclosure 10 , View reasons restricted (5/10)
- Restricted enclosure 11 , View reasons restricted (5/11)
- Restricted enclosure 12 , View reasons restricted (5/12)
- Restricted enclosure 13 , View reasons restricted (5/13)
- Restricted enclosure 14 , View reasons restricted (5/14)
That the applicant is a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Private Hire\Hackney Carriage Driver’s Licence. This applies for a 12 month probationary period given the panel’s concerns about the applicant’s pattern of speeding offences and failure to heed warnings. In consideration of this, the applicant is to complete, to a satisfactory standard, a Driver Speed Awareness course. This is to be completed within 8 weeks from the date of this hearing and all associated costs incurred to be the responsibility of the applicant. Upon completion, the applicant is to present a certificate to the satisfaction of the Licensing Section of the Council.
The Licensing Team Leader presented the report to consider the conduct and convictions of a Private Hire/Hackney Carriage (Joint) Driver.
The applicant asked if he could correct a misstatement within his written representations appended to the report. He clarified that the last conviction on his DVLA record had been received earlier in the year which meant that he currently had nine points on his licence with no other prosecutions pending.
The Chairman expressed concerns about warnings previously issued to the applicant, including failure to disclose offences and a further breach of licensing conditions. During questioning, the applicant detailed the circumstances involved in those convictions.
The Solicitor referred to the applicant’s conviction record and asked whether he had an issue with speeding. In acknowledging the point, the applicant explained that on each occasion, he had been driving only slightly above the speed limit and that he had accumulated significant annual mileage during that period. He said that the speeding convictions were due to lack of concentration and that he had not been carrying customers at those times. In relation to his last speeding conviction on a road with average speed cameras, he had not been aware of any warning signs to that effect and had not challenged this as he felt obliged to admit the offence. Since that time, he had made a number of changes to improve his life and address health issues.
In response to questions from the panel, the applicant said there was no excuse for speeding and that subsequent changes to his worklife had helped him to understand his responsibilities and achieve a better work-life balance. He had recently successfully completed a self-funded Certificate of Professional Competence (CPC) course to re-educate himself and improve his driving.
The Solicitor questioned why the applicant had failed to react to previous warnings. The applicant admitted that he had not taken the offences as seriously as he should have done and that he now appreciated the importance of his licence. Following further discussion, he said that he had recently read the standard licensing conditions and fully understood the implications of any breaches.
When the Chairman was satisfied that all relevant questions had been raised, he asked that the applicant and the Licensing Team Leader leave the meeting to enable the panel to reach a decision.
5.1 Determination of the Application
In determining the application, the panel considered the applicant’s written and verbal representations and the Council’s guidance on the treatment of convictions. Given the warnings previously issued to the applicant, the panel had concerns about his apparent disregard for licensing rules. However, having considered the explanations given by the applicant and the positive actions taken since, the panel felt that he was a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Private Hire/Hackney Carriage (Joint) Driver’s Licence subject to a probationary period and the completion of a speed awareness course.
The Licensing Team Leader and the applicant were invited to return so that the meeting could be reconvened.