Issue - meetings
Renewal of Public Space Protection Orders
Meeting: 20/10/2020 - Cabinet (Item 30)
30 Renewal of Public Space Protection Orders PDF 112 KB
Additional documents:
- Appendix 1 - Renewal of Public Space Protection Orders, item 30 PDF 58 KB
- Appendix 2 - Renewal of Public Space Protection Orders, item 30 PDF 61 KB
- Webcast for Renewal of Public Space Protection Orders
Decision:
As detailed in the recommendations.
Minutes:
Councillor Thomas introduced the report and explained that Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPOs) were an intervention to prevent individuals, or groups, committing anti-social behaviour in a public space.
The current PSPOs would expire on 19th October 2020. Cabinet had approved commencement of consultation on 14th July 2020 and this report provided details of the process and outcome of the consultation.
Councils could make a PSPO after consultation with the Police, the Police and Crime Commissioner and appropriate Community representatives. They could be enforced by Council officers, Police Officers or Police Community Support Officers.
Under provisions of the Act, Flintshire’s Alcohol Designated Public Place Order transitional automatically into a PSPO. This order allowed Police Officers the power to ask members of the public to surrender alcohol if a member of the public was believed to be causing a nuisance in a public place. This was not a total alcohol ban in public area, and was not applicable to licensed premised, but encouragement of sensible drinking.
Since the implementation of the dog control PSPO over 1,100 dog walkers had been approached and provided with information and advice on the prohibitions of the Order. A total of three Fixed Penalty Notices (FPN’s) had been issued for dog fouling and 45 for dogs entering the boundaries of marked sports pitches. The Council had adopted a high profile approach in order to act as a deterrent and enforcement officers entered into dialogue with dog walkers during their patrols to ensure that they were aware of the PSPOs. As officers were in uniform it was less likely that dog walkers would not comply with the local rules and it should be noted that a high number of FPNs was not the only measure by which PSPOs should be measured and overall cleanliness of the county and public awareness of the FPN process should also be considered.
Four representations had been received following the closure of the consultation. Two comments on the exclusion of dogs on school grounds in relation to Buckley Elfed High School, with a request to walk dogs along pathways that cross that schools grounds. Following discussions with the Headteacher, it was recommended that the representation should not be considered further.
The third representation was on the Ornamental Gardens in Mold, requesting that this area be included in the ‘exclusion of dogs’ category. At present gardens were not included in PSPOs, therefore it was not recommended that this area alone be included at this time. However, a review could be undertaken of all garden areas to assess an appropriate dog control method to suit the needs of residents.
The fourth representation concerned the alcohol control PSPO and questioned the enforcement of the PSPO. Councillor Thomas explained it was about having the PSPO in place so if needed it could be enforced.
Further representations had been made by Connah’s Quay Angling Club, outlining the problems the club encountered with uncontrolled dogs swimming in the lakes. Work was being undertaken with Streetscene, ... view the full minutes text for item 30