Issue - meetings
Internal Audit Progress Report
Meeting: 12/12/2012 - Audit Committee (Item 42)
42 Internal Audit Progress Report PDF 32 KB
Additional documents:
- Enc. 1 for General Template (all other Committees) for Internal Audit Progress Report, item 42 PDF 49 KB
- Enc. 2 for General Template (all other Committees) for Internal Audit Progress Report, item 42 PDF 162 KB
- Enc. 3 for General Template (all other Committees) for Internal Audit Progress Report, item 42 PDF 25 KB
- Enc. 4 for General Template (all other Committees) for Internal Audit Progress Report, item 42 PDF 30 KB
- Enc. 5 for General Template (all other Committees) for Internal Audit Progress Report, item 42 PDF 14 KB
Decision:
(a) That the report be accepted;
(b) That the Internal Audit Manager provide a note to the Committee on the number of occasions in recent years where the allocated number of investigation days had been exceeded;
(c) That the appropriate level of senior officer from the Lifelong Learning Directorate be invited to attend a future meeting of the Committee to discuss the significant failings raised on school funding arrangements; and
(d) That where Internal Audit recommendations had not been implemented, particularly on fundamental areas of risk, future Internal Audit Progress Reports to include a brief summary on the area of risk, responsible manager and reason for non-implementation and whether this was acceptable.
Minutes:
The Internal Audit Manager presented a progress update report of the Internal Audit department.
Audit Plan and Resources
It had been reported at the previous meeting that the allocated 200 days used for investigations for the whole of the year would be exceeded due to a major investigation being undertaken. The Committee had therefore proposed that additional resources be sought to complete work within the Audit Plan. The Internal Audit Manager reported that this had been agreed by Cabinet and that additional resources were being sought to start in January 2013.
In response to questions from Councillor I.B. Roberts, the Internal Audit Manager said that to date, 347 investigation days had been used for this year and that the additional resources being sought would be sufficient to enable him to provide his annual audit opinion and would be kept under review. He was unable to estimate a completion date for the major investigation taking place as this was still ongoing. The Chief Executive said that some catch-up work would be required due to the time taken for the additional resources to be brought in.
Councillor Roberts commented on available resources from RSM Tenon Plc to support Internal Audit. The Head of Finance thanked the Committee for proposing the allocation of additional resources and was satisfied with what could be achieved from that. She said it was intended to complete the Plan in a risk managed approach by seeking additional resources through RSM Tenon Plc and other external agencies as necessary to achieve the required level of resource.
The Internal Audit Manager agreed to provide a note to the Committee in response to Councillor Roberts’ question on how many times the allocated investigation days had been exceeded in recent years.
Following a request by the Chair, the Head of ICT & Customer Services provided clarification on current projects on IT procurement and electronic document management.
Final Reports
On school funds, the Internal Audit Manager explained that no previous audit had been undertaken as these were not Council assets, however following a recent investigation, an audit had been carried out on a sample of schools, resulting in nine significant recommendations highlighting the need for improved guidance and monitoring. Responding to a query by Mr. P. Williams, he explained that in this case, the Lifelong Learning Directorate would be expected to implement the recommendations made by Internal Audit by the timelines indicated.
Mr. P. Green remarked that this issue was about reputation. Ms. A. Hughes said that auditing the funds was outside the Council’s remit but that it would be appropriate to ensure that funds were used in the correct way as the Council had a duty of care to individuals who had contributed to the funds.
Whilst Councillor Roberts did not wish to impose restrictions on the use of school funds, he felt that a control framework was needed and that this could be considered by a formal reporting mechanism such as the Lifelong Learning Overview & Scrutiny Committee. The Chair referred to the ... view the full minutes text for item 42