Agenda item

Medium Term Libraries Plan - An assessment of the Feasibility of the Community Asset Transfer of Rural Libraries

Decision:

(a)       That the assessment of the feasibility of Community Asset Transfers for the libraries in Hope, Mynydd Isa and Saltney, in particular the formal consultation with communities be received, subject to:

 

(i)         the holding of a meeting with interested parties in Saltney within the next four weeks;

(ii)        the provision of the information requested on the operation of the Library Management System; how it currently relates to book stock and acquisitions and how it could be developed for the future;

(iii)       the increase in the ‘lent book stock’ to community operated libraries being set at 100 books

 

(b)       That the Committee’s views on the feasibility of Community Asset Transfers and alternative acceptable solutions for the three libraries is noted and referenced by the officers in further developing solutions. 

Minutes:

Councillor Chris Bithell introduced a report to provide feedback on the feasibility of community asset transfers for libraries in the areas of Hope, Mynydd Isa and Saltney. 

 

                        The report was about the second stage of the implementation of the Medium Term Libraries Plan agreed by Cabinet in March 2015 to ensure sustainable libraries infrastructure for the future based on a combination of hubs, mobile and housebound provision.  The new community library hub based in Deeside Leisure Centre was progressing and would be open by March 2016 and the transfer of Mancot Library was also moving forward.  The second stage was to consider the feasibility of the rural libraries and it was reported that positive interest in the transfer of Hope and Mynydd Isa library services had been expressed.  There had not been any interest from Saltney Community Council in progressing the CAT but both Ward Members had asked for an extension of time for consideration of a CAT.  Work was ongoing with the interested parties to support them through the process and Councillor Bithell gave thanks for the enthusiasm that had been shown by those involved in the establishment of a CAT for the Mancot Library and their determination that the service should continue.  It was anticipated that the completion of a CAT for the Hope and Mynydd Isa Libraries could be finalised during the original timeframe of April to June 2016. 

 

                        The Chief Officer spoke of the two options for a CAT based on Welsh Government guidance which was for the community to operate a book stock and IT equipment with no professional library input or the community buy back professional librarians and/or access to the library management system (LMS).  He explained that the mobile library service would continue to operate and another option for the renewal of books was the book collection service, for those unable to access a hub or mobile library service, which could hold 75 books and a community play group which could have 30 books.  The option of the community purchasing the LMS and the assistance of professional librarians was the most expensive at £15,000 to £30,000.  The Chief Officer provided details of the LMS and explained that it had to be operated by professional library staff because of data protection issues. 

 

Hope

Support had been expressed by Castell Alun High School to work with the community to enable the library to be open to the community during school hours.  It was also reported that the local Ward Member had asked for the retention of a professional library service.  Interest in a CAT had been expressed by ‘Friends of Hope Library Group’ and Hope Community Council.  During the formal consultation process, a request had been received that Flintshire County Council provide 108 hours of library service at Hope Library during the schools holidays.  The Chief Officer felt that the completion of a CAT was feasible and could be achieved in the timeframe of April to June 2016. 

 

Mynydd Isa

The Chief Officer explained that a meeting had been held with the local Community Council to discuss a range of issues and interest in a CAT had been received from Caffi Isa.  A second stage business plan for the CAT had been approved and the application was progressing well. 

 

Saltney

An expression of interest was received early in the process but during the formal consultation stage, there had not been any requests to consider progressing a CAT.  Requests had been made for an extension of time but at this stage it did not appear that a CAT was feasible for Saltney Library. 

 

            The Chief Officer explained that the total savings of £88,000 were reported for the three libraries and the key risks were reported in paragraph 4.01.  Following a query from the Chairman about the library service staff ending their employment in the libraries in April 2016, the Chief Officer confirmed that if it was feasible that a CAT could be achieved between April and June 2016, then the professional library service would not be removed until the opportunity had been given for the CAT to be successful. 

 

            The Chairman exercised his discretion to allow Councillor Hilary McGuill to speak as Local Member on Mynydd Isa Library Service. 

 

            Councillor McGuill said that the library was well used and she welcomed the enthusiasm of those willing to take the library service forward but said that a key consideration was the book stock and how it could be accessed.  Information had been provided that those unable to use the mobile library service or hub, such as residential homes, could have 75 books and play groups could access 30 books but Councillor McGuill queried how new books could be accessed.  The purchase of the LMS at £5 per head would total £30,000 for Mynydd Isa and this was not affordable as part of the CAT.  Councillor McGuill sought clarification on whether the LMS was outsourced and felt that the option should be in place to link the LMS to community libraries if renegotiation of the contract took place with Welsh Government (WG).  She welcomed the comment that the library staff would not be terminated on 31 March 2016 if there was the possibility to achieve a CAT but reiterated her concerns about the inability to access the County Library book stock. 

 

            The Chief Officer spoke of other options for renewal of book stock for the community library such as the gifting of books from those in the community and discussions could also take place with the Welsh Book Council on how to access donations.  A consideration could be given by the local Town or Community Council to make a contribution for the purchase of new books each year; Hawarden Community Council was considering a donation of £2,000 to Mancot Library to renew the book stock.  The Chief Executive advised that he could undertake discussions at a national level on whether the Welsh Book Council could work with WG on the provision of donating books to community libraries. 

            Councillor Clive Carver expressed concern about the £5 per head charge for the use of the LMS and queried whether this was the system operating in school libraries.  He was unaware of the donation of £2,000 from Hawarden Community Council referred to earlier and suggested that it had not been discussed or agreed.  He also indicated that he had been advised of a closure date for Hawarden Library but had not been informed by Flintshire County Council of the date. 

 

            The Chief Officer advised that the school library service was separate to the main service and did not use the LMS.  For the CAT for Hope, it was suggested that the provision of the library could continue to use the school library system which was already in place.  Discussions on the closure of Hawarden Library were due to take place in the coming weeks and a date had not yet been confirmed. 

 

            Councillor Veronica Gay referred to the issue of provision of a library in Saltney.  She said that proposals put forward in 2013/14 had not been acted upon and an expression of interest submitted in February 2015 had not been responded to.  Consideration of a CAT had been made by Saltney Town Council in November 2015 but it was felt that the timescale of April to June 2016 was not achievable.  Councillor Gay said that there were a number of community groups willing to be involved in the scheme but a proposal had not been submitted to date.  She asked that the issue of Saltney Library be deferred and that the Committee carry out a site visit to consider the options available to the community.  She added that savings of £100,000 were achievable and would still enable a library service to be provided in the community.  Councillor Gay suggested that a deferment of 12 months would allow all interested parties to carry out discussions on taking the proposals forward.  The Chief Officer explained that this report was not making a final decision on the timescale and that officers were willing to carry out discussions with any interested parties to establish whether agreement could be reached during the proposed timescale of April to June 2016.  The Chief Executive indicated that a meeting could be facilitated with interested parties but that this must be achieved within a reasonable timescale.  He suggested that a meeting could be held within the next four weeks to establish whether an agreement could be reached and the situation could then be reviewed.  Councillor Gay welcomed the suggestion for a meeting but indicated that she still felt that it was necessary for the Committee to carry out a site visit and that she was awaiting a response to an email she had submitted in December 2015.  The Member Engagement Manager suggested that the community meeting be held before the Committee carried out the site visit.  In referring to the current location of the library, Councillor Gay spoke of the financial drain on the Council.

 

            The Chairman also allowed Councillor Tim Newhouse, Local Member for Hope, to address the Committee.  In referring to paragraph 1.04, Councillor Newhouse sought clarification on what was meant by a ‘professional library service’.  The Chief Officer explained that it referred to the number of hours of operation by the professional library during the school holidays.  Councillor Newhouse explained that he had asked for a librarian to staff the library for 108 hours during the school holidays and not for the retention of the professional library service at £5 per head, as reported.  He also felt that paragraph 1.08 implied that if a CAT was not feasible, then the library in Hope would close even during the school term.  The Chief Officer responded that he was confident that the CAT could be achieved and the Chief Executive commented on the need to identify whether the progression of the CAT was sustainable or not.  He added that the service could be at risk if the CAT could not progress and that it was not possible to give a guarantee that Hope Library would not close.  In response to a comment from Councillor Newhouse about whether the library would continue to operate during the school term, i.e. 40 weeks of the year, the Chief Executive said that this was an option for consideration by the community if the CAT was not achievable. 

 

            Councillor Mike Reece indicated that a stock of books may be available from Bagillt Library which had closed some time ago as a county library and was now run as a community library.  Councillor Paul Shotton sought clarification on whether it was possible for an extension to be applied to consider options for Saltney Library.  

 

            Councillor Dave Mackie expressed significant concern at the amount of information that had been received at the meeting that had not been included in the report.  He concurred with the importance of being able to rotate book stock and sought clarification on how schools were able to access county books when they did not use the professional library system at a cost of £5 per head.  In response to the comment about additional information being provided, Councillor Aaron Shotton said that the details were provided to ensure that the Committee had the most up-to-date information before them when considering the report.  He added that there were a number of innovative solutions that the community could explore to enable their book stock to be renewed, some of which had already been mentioned earlier.  On the issue of the school library system, the Chief Officer advised that the school operated its own management system for its books and did not use the LMS referred to in the report.  The Principal Librarian said that most schools operated their own management system and the extension of this to support the community was being explored by Castell Alun High School.  She advised that it was recommended that books were replaced every nine years but added that community libraries may also not need to stock as large a range of books as a county library.  The Principal Librarian advised that grants that were not available to county libraries were an option that community libraries could consider to enable the restocking of books.  The county libraries also offered the option of electronic books which could be accessed for free from anywhere by members of the library. 

 

            Councillor Bithell commented on the alternative ways of providing a library service and re-stocking books and identified Bagillt library as an example of a community run library that was working well.  The Chief Executive also suggested that a number of libraries could work together to share their library stock. 

 

            Councillor Mackie felt that Flintshire rate payers all paid for a library service with a good stock of books but because of the financial situation, the number of outlets and access to book stock was reducing.  He said that groups were willing to take on the running of a community library but he could not understand why the book stock could also not be included in a CAT and felt sure that a system could be identified to allow this to happen.  He felt that local groups setting up a community library should be able to access books through the LMS and that the charge of £5 per head was not an additional cost as this was already being covered.  The Chief Officer explained that the mobile and housebound service would still be available but the LMS could only be operated by professional librarians and the cost of this was unsustainable for CATs.  The Principal Librarian detailed how the LMS operated and how this tracked where each book was situated.  Councillor Aaron Shotton understood the frustration of Councillor Mackie about the book stock but reminded the Committee of the need to save 30% through the Medium Term Plan for libraries.  The Chief Executive suggested that further information be provided to Members on the LMS and possible book replacement solutions.  He explained that the system covered all libraries in Wales and the ongoing cost was proportionate to use.  Councillor Bithell said that even in the worst case scenario, Flintshire would meet the Welsh Government standard of providing libraries to 75% of the population within 2.5 miles.         

 

            Councillor Robin Guest welcomed the fact that the introduction to the report had been provided by the Cabinet Member, Councillor Bithell and thanked him for doing so.  He said that the key factor in the continuation of the service was the provision of books and book lending.  He added that even though final details of options for two of the three libraries were not yet known, he felt that there was a high level of confidence that a large stock of books could be accessed.  He suggested that the figure of 100 new books through the collections service be included in the resolution of the Committee.  The Chief Officer clarified that through the managed collections service, 30 books were available to play groups and 70 to library users who could not access the mobile service or hub.  This information had not been included in the report as the service was already available to community libraries.  Councillor Guest also welcomed the suggestion for additional information to be provided on the library service. 

 

            The Chairman allowed Councillor Richard Lloyd to address the Committee.  He said that the library was currently in a prominent position in Saltney but was situated in a portakabin and he felt that if the service was to be moved to the building where the community centre and youth club were housed, then it may not be as well used.  The cost of £41,000 to provide the service could not be met by Saltney Town Council.  He added that a CAT for the community centre and youth club was being considered by Saltney Town Council. 

 

            In response to a query from Councillor Carver about the need for the compliance with the Data Protection Act, the Chief Officer indicated that there was a requirement that only professional library staff could administer the LMS.  Councillor Carver suggested that different levels of access could be provided on the LMS to allow those operating a community library to be able to operate the information held on the system.  In response to a further comment from Councillor Carver, the Principal Librarian explained that anyone could access the book stock on line but information on library customers could only be recorded and used through the LMS.  She added that the new library system that was due to introduced would have different levels of access but it had not been confirmed whether the new system would be used in Flintshire.  The Member Engagement Manager said that he would consider the comments in his role as Chair of the Data Protection Team and discuss them with colleagues.  The Chief Executive said that WG guidance had been followed when considering the options but even if access could be given to community libraries, there would still be significant cost implications which maybe unsustainable for the groups concerned. 

 

            Councillor McGuill welcomed the comments that had been made at the meeting, particularly about the ability of community libraries to be able to access 100 new books.  Councillor Gay said that the current library in Saltney was leased and was situated on land that the Council did not own.  The suggested location within the community centre and youth club building was on a bus route and may raise awareness of the library service.              

 

            The Chief Officer advised that there were certain requirements about how a library could operate but said that the discussions and comments made would allow a model to be created that could be used as a solution for library options for other communities in the future.  

 

            RESOLVED:

 

(a)       That the assessment of the feasibility of Community Asset Transfers for the libraries in Hope, Mynydd Isa and Saltney, in particular the formal consultation with communities be received, subject to:

 

(i)         the holding of a meeting with interested parties in Saltney within the next four weeks;

(ii)        the provision of the information requested on the operation of the Library Management System; how it currently relates to book stock and acquisitions and how it could be developed for the future;

(iii)       the increase in the ‘lent book stock’ to community operated libraries being set at 100 books

 

(b)       That the Committee’s views on the feasibility of Community Asset Transfers and alternative acceptable solutions for the three libraries is noted and referenced by the officers in further developing solutions. 

Supporting documents: